nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 03, No.385 145-154
面向公正转型的中国碳普惠机制探究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重大项目“低碳发展背景下我国新能源产业创新机制与风险防控研究”(21&ZD108)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

完善的碳治理体系是兼顾公正与转型双重目标的制度设计。我国现行碳治理体系在削减碳排放总量方面成效显著,但存在参与不均、红利分配不公、区域发展不协调等问题,未能充分回应公正转型要求。作为一项在长期实践探索中逐渐形成的制度创新,碳普惠机制通过拓展公众和中小企业参与边界,有效提升了转型参与的包容性、竞争的公平性、红利分配的公正性,已经成为中国特色碳治理体系的重要组成部分。然而,碳普惠机制在现实运行中还存在制度设计不协同、技术标准不健全、数据信任体系薄弱、减排成果消纳渠道少、社会认知和行为激励有待强化等瓶颈,制约了其功能充分发挥。建议进一步强化顶层设计,健全碳减排核算和技术标准体系,构建统一高效的数据治理机制,拓展减排成果消纳渠道,完善多元主体参与的激励机制,推动形成政府引导、市场运作、社会协同相结合的运行格局,丰富完善中国特色碳治理体系,既为实现“双碳”目标提供制度保障,又为世界各国实现降碳和公正转型提供中国方案。

Abstract:

A well-developed carbon governance system is an institutional design that balances the dual goals of fairness and transition. China's current carbon governance system has achieved significant results in reducing total carbon emissions, but it suffers from uneven participation, unfair distribution of benefits, and uncoordinated regional development, making it difficult to fully meet the requirements of just transition. As an institutional innovation gradually formed through long-term practical exploration, the carbon inclusive mechanism has effectively enhanced the inclusiveness of transition participation, the fairness of competition, and the justice of benefit distribution by expanding the participation boundaries for the public and small and medium-sized enterprises. It has become an important component of China's carbon governance system with distinctive features. However, the carbon inclusive mechanism faces bottlenecks in its practical implementation, including uncoordinated institutional design, inadequate technical standards, weak data trust systems, limited channels for absorbing emission reduction achievements, and deficiencies in social awareness and behavioral incentive,which constrain its functional effectiveness. Recommendations include further strengthening top-level design, improving the carbon emission reduction accounting and technical standard system, establishing a unified and efficient data governance mechanism, expanding channels for absorbing emission reduction achievements, refining incentive mechanisms for multi-stakeholder participation, and promoting an operational framework that integrates government guidance, market operation, and social collaboration.These measures aim to enrich and improve China's distinctive carbon governance system, providing institutional safeguards for achieving the "dual carbon" goals and offering a Chinese solution for global efforts to reduce carbon emissions and achieve just transition.

参考文献

[1]王红帅,董战峰.生态环境治理体系和治理能力现代化:内涵特征、推进思路和关键任务[J].改革,2023(12):138-150.

[2]李金铠,刘守临,张瑾.加快新型能源体系建设,以绿色化、低碳化、生态化推进中国式现代化[J].生态经济,2023(6):13-17.

[3]蓝虹,杜彦霖.自愿碳交易市场:产权量化标准与生态价值实现路径[J].改革,2024(4):77-92.

[4]张希良,张达,余润心.中国特色全国碳市场设计理论与实践[J].管理世界,2021(8):80-95.

[5]刘航.碳普惠制:理论分析、经验借鉴与框架设计[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2018(5):86-94.

[6]国务院新闻办公室.碳达峰碳中和的中国行动[R].北京:国务院新闻办公室,2025.

[7]闫新杰,丁辰鑫,辛龙.碳普惠制对包容性低碳增长的影响研究[J].生态经济,2024(9):13-22.

[8]宋蕾.气候政策创新的演变:气候减缓、适应和可持续发展的包容性发展路径[J].社会科学,2018(3):29-40.

[9]袁家海,王媛,杨晓文,等.“双碳”目标下省级煤电退出的就业影响与脆弱性评估[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2023(7):67-80.

[10]袁佳,陈波,吴莹,等.碳达峰碳中和目标下公正转型对我国就业的挑战与对策[J].金融发展评论,2022(1):44-51.

[11]王中航,张敏思,苏畅,等.我国碳普惠机制实践经验与发展建议[J].环境保护,2023(4):55-59.

[12]王建明,王俊豪.公众低碳消费模式的影响因素模型与政府管制政策——基于扎根理论的一个探索性研究[J].管理世界,2011(4):58-68.

[13]王金南,董战峰,蒋洪强,等.中国环境保护战略政策70年历史变迁与改革方向[J].环境科学研究,2019(10):1636-1644.

[14]能链智电,成都数据集团股份有限公司.2024碳普惠发展白皮书[R].北京:能链智电,2024.

[15]孙成龙,沈厚菊,鲁汇智.碳普惠机制助力长三角区域协同发展:效能、困境与实现路径[J].生态文明研究,2025(5):64-75.

[16]王遥,任玉洁.“双碳”目标下的中国绿色金融体系构建[J].当代经济科学,2022(5):1-13.

基本信息:

中图分类号:X321

引用信息:

[1]李金铠,刘守临,董战峰.面向公正转型的中国碳普惠机制探究[J].改革,2026,No.385(03):145-154.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金重大项目“低碳发展背景下我国新能源产业创新机制与风险防控研究”(21&ZD108)

发布时间:

2026-03-30

出版时间:

2026-03-30

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文